What is Apache Kafka?

Apache Kafka is a robust, open-source stream-processing platform that has revolutionized how companies process and analyze real-time data. Kafka uses a binary TCP-based protocol and is designed to handle data streams from multiple sources, delivering messages to multiple consumers with high performance and in real-time. Kafka was originally developed at LinkedIn in 2010 as a solution to improve the company's data pipelines. In 2011, Kafka was open-sourced as part of the Apache Software Foundation, making it available to a broader community. In 2012, Kafka became a top-level Apache project , signifying its maturity and the community's confidence in its potential and stability. This milestone was crucial in cementing Kafka's reputation as a reliable and scalable choice for handling real-time data streams. The introduction of the Kafka Streams API in 2016 marked its evolution from a messaging queue to a full-fledged stream processing framework, enabling users to process their data directly within Kafka. This shift expanded Kafka's use cases beyond just messaging and into the realm of complex event processing and real-time analytics. One of Kafka's most influential milestones came in 2017 with the introduction of exactly-once semantics . This made stream processing more reliable by ensuring that events are neither lost nor duplicated.

How does Apache Kafka differ from Pulsar and RabbitMQ?

Apache Kafka's architecture is fundamentally designed as a distributed commit log. At its core, it uses a broker system where each broker is responsible for storing data and serving clients. Kafka organizes messages into topics, and each topic is divided into partitions to ensure parallel processing and scalability. Producers publish messages to topics, and consumers subscribe to topics and process the feed of messages. Kafka maintains high performance and durability by replicating the partitions across multiple brokers and uses Zookeeper for broker coordination and maintaining the cluster state. Kafka's architecture excels in scenarios requiring high throughput and durability, making it ideal for building real-time streaming data pipelines and applications. Apache Pulsar is recognized for its two-layered architecture , separating the serving layer (brokers) from the storage layer (BookKeeper). This distinct architecture allows for independent scaling of serving and storage resources, providing flexibility, and efficiency in resource utilization. Pulsar's brokers handle client connections and implement various messaging protocols, while the BookKeeper handles durable storage of messages. Similar to Kafka, Pulsar organizes messages into topics and partitions for scalability. However, Pulsar enhances its architecture with features like multi-tenancy and geo-replication out of the box. This allows for effective resource isolation and data synchronization across different clusters. Pulsar's architecture is often chosen for its cloud-native design , supporting real-time analytics and data integration in a multi-tenant environment. RabbitMQ follows a more traditional message broker architecture with a focus on flexibility and reliability. It manages and routes messages through exchanges based on rules defined in bindings. Messages are then stored in queues until consumed by applications. RabbitMQ's architecture is focused on ensuring message delivery and providing various routing options. This makes it versatile for different messaging patterns. It supports multiple messaging protocols , such as AMQP, MQTT, and STOMP, offering a broad range of compatibility with different systems. RabbitMQ's architecture shines in scenarios that require complex routing, immediate message delivery, and a guarantee that messages are safely transferred.

How can the performance of Apache Kafka be optimized?

To improve Apache Kafka performance, consider balancing the number of partitions , optimal replication factors , adjusting broker topic configurations, optimizing producer settings like batch size and compression, etc. It is also important to fine-tune consumer fetch sizes and manage hardware resources efficiently. Increasing the number of partitions enables more parallelism, thus also improving throughput. However, too many partitions can, vice versa, increase overhead and decrease performance. A guide by Microsoft details how to optimize Kafka on Azure by adjusting producer, broker, and consumer settings. Another tutorial (by HUMAN Security, Oct 2023) focuses on fine-tuning Kafka by changing compression types. Other factors can also increase Kafka's throughput. SSDs, for example, can improve performance over HDDs due to their faster read/write speeds.

How much throughput can Apache Kafka handle?

The performance of Apache Kafka can be significantly high, but it's not a fixed number. The throughput depends on various factors—including hardware configuration, network setup, configuration, topic partitioning, message size, and the specific workload being run. Generally, Kafka is known for its ability to handle massive load scenarios. Back in 2014, the LinkedIn Engineering blog revealed that Apache Kafka can handle more than 2 million records per second on three commodity machines. In 2022, this figure was eventually confirmed by Honeycomb for their real-life deployment, which uses the Confluent platform for the purpose.

How can one measure the performance of Apache Kafka?

If you are looking to conduct your own Apache Kafka performance tests, there are several tools that can be used for the process. For instance, the OpenMessaging benchmark by Confluent is one of the most popular tools used within the industry. Another application that can be used is JMeter—see the docs and read this guide from Blazemeter to learn how to test Apache Kafka with this product. Developed by Grafana Labs, k6 is one more open-source load testing tool. This blog post details how to monitor Kafka producers and consumers. Another guide demonstrates how to determine the maximum load with Gatling.

A List of 30+ Apache Kafka Performance Benchmarks (2020–2023) - Altoroslabs Technology Blog | Latest News in Custom Software Development

Article

A List of 30+ Apache Kafka Performance Benchmarks (2020–2023)

11 months ago

Alex Khizhniak

Explore evaluations of Kafka’s performance on various cloud platforms, as well as benchmarks against other messaging tools.

Article

Rule-Based Stream Data Processing at the Edge with eKuiper

1 year ago

Governed by LF and designed to shift data analytics closer to devices, this lightweight IoT tool is actively advancing toward…

Article

A Collection of 20+ MQTT Broker Performance Benchmarks (2020–2023)

1 year ago

What are the latencies and throughput of Mosquitto, VerneMQ, EMQX, NanoMQ, HiveMQ, RabbitMQ, FlashMQ, ActiveMQ, etc.?

Article

Industrial IoT in Manufacturing: Major Pains for a CTO to Address

1 year ago

Aiming for operational improvements, manufacturers are struggling with system complexities. Is there a way out?

Article

LF’s Project Alvarium: Ensuring Trusted IoT Data at the Edge with DLT

1 year ago

Supported by Dell, IOTA, Intel, etc., this open-source project assigns trust scores to sensor data, using distributed ledger as immutable…

Article

Alternatives to Google Cloud IoT Core—Where to Migrate?

2 years ago

Google will sunset its IoT Core on August 16, 2023. Some of the edge devices may become unavailable, experts say.

Article

46% of Medical IoT Devices Have a Vulnerability, a New Study Reveals

2 years ago

For 53% of institutions, breaches in connected systems affect patients—e.g., lead to delayed surgeries or transfers to other facilities.

Article

Can Digital Tools Cut Long Wait Times as Banks Fail to Catch Up?

2 years ago

As 2022–2023 reports show that consumers wait for too long and expect much more from their providers, banks need to…

Article

What Can We Learn from Stanford Hospital’s Use of IoT and Data?

2 years ago

By investing $2B in innovations, the medical institution is creating a smart hospital—still, facing technological issues on this journey.

Article

The Challenges of Implementing Data-Driven Personalized Healthcare

2 years ago

While innovation and EHRs enable more patient-centric care, ensuring interoperability and providing in-home care can be tricky.

Show more Posts

Headline